متن اصلی نمونه

Introduction
Access to safe drinking water is essential for health, dignity, and economic stability in every society. Some people argue that, because clean water is a basic human right, governments should provide it to every household free of charge. I strongly agree with this view because universal access safeguards public health and promotes social equality.

Body Paragraph 1
The primary reason for supporting free household water supply is its crucial role in protecting public health. Waterborne diseases such as cholera and dysentery spread rapidly where people cannot afford clean water. International health organisations consistently report that communities with guaranteed clean water experience far fewer outbreaks of these illnesses. When families no longer have to choose between purchasing clean water and paying for other necessities, they maintain better hygiene and reduce healthcare costs. This clearly demonstrates that free access to water is an effective preventive measure, saving both lives and government medical expenditures.

Body Paragraph 2
Furthermore, providing water at no cost fosters social equity and economic productivity. In many regions, low-income households spend a significant share of their income on utilities, which deepens the cycle of poverty. By ensuring a free minimum water supply, governments enable families to reallocate funds toward education or small businesses, stimulating local economies. For example, in several European countries where municipalities cover basic water needs through taxation, poverty levels are lower and community wellbeing is higher. Consequently, free water provision not only reduces inequality but also benefits society as a whole.

Conclusion
In conclusion, I maintain that every home should receive a free and reliable supply of clean water. Guaranteeing this essential resource protects public health and narrows the gap between rich and poor. Unless future technology makes water purification universally cheap and effortless, the moral and practical case for government-funded water remains overwhelming.